help button Ask For Help

Department Blog

H/SS & Gov Info Services

Google publishes Stanford dissertations online

November 17th, 2009 by Roberto C. Delgadillo

Google publishes Stanford dissertations online

John Wildermuth, Special to The Chronicle

Monday, November 16, 2009

Stanford doctoral students will now be able to post their dissertations on Google as the university replaces the traditional bound volumes of acid-free paper with e-files of scholarly work.
Beginning last week, students who used to lug three or four copies of their capstone university work to Stanford’s registrar’s office could file their dissertations by simply uploading them from their computer.
“It doesn’t make sense anymore that the final medium for scholarship should still be paper,” said university Registrar Tom Black, one of the administrators behind the change.
The switch, which began last Monday, will affect the more than 600 doctoral dissertations filed each year at Stanford. Plans already are being made to extend the electronic effort to thousands of master’s theses and honors papers.
The key to the effort is the university’s partnership with Google, which will allow anyone with a computer to access the work of Stanford doctoral students.
“We have way north of 35,000 bound dissertations on our shelves,” said university Librarian Michael Keller, who has been pushing for the digital dissertations. “Many of them just stay on the shelf, forgotten and invisible, or scholars have to pay enormous sums to come to Stanford to read them.”
The Google link “will allow our students’ work to be seen more readily,” Keller added. “It may also help a student get identified online as an expert in a certain subject, which could help in the promotion of a young career.”
While other universities already allow electronic submissions, “we’re the only one we know of that’s going the whole route, with approval online and then sending it down the electronic pipe,” Keller said.
Until now, Stanford has used ProQuest, which has been in the academic publication business since the days of microfilm, to make its dissertations available to the scholarly community.
More creative freedom

But using the company costs money, which meant that students would end up paying as much as $221 in fees when they filed their dissertations with the registrar’s office. Stanford’s electronic filing system will be free, although students still can pay to have their dissertations listed on ProQuest, an online subscription service for dissertations and other academic publications.
The new system will give students more freedom to be creative in producing their work, Keller said, because electronic documents allow easier use of spreadsheets and graphics, as well as hot links to pictures, citations and other online resources.
There’s something in it for the university, also. Typically, students would have to print out their dissertations on pricey, acid-free, library stock paper, with two copies for the university library, another for ProQuest and yet another for their academic department. The staff in the Registrar’s Office would then have to go over each dissertation by hand before sending it out for binding, even measuring the margins to make sure the submissions met the exacting rules for publication.
“This is more convenient, more affordable and offers the students more choices,” because they can still go the traditional route if they prefer, Black said.
While the new program cost Stanford less than $50,000 to set up, there were plenty of academic questions that had to be answered.
Some balked at first

While the chance to put their work online for public viewing was enthusiastically endorsed by students in the sciences, there were more concerns from the humanities students, said Richard Roberts, a history professor who chairs the university’s committee on graduate studies.

“Science students are used to having their papers published quickly as journal articles,” he said. “But the ‘tenure book’ is very important in the humanities, and students were worried that making their work instantly accessible might affect publishers’ decisions later on.”

The problem was solved by allowing the graduate students to embargo their work for up to five years, to give them time to get it published. They also will be allowed to decide whether to release either 20 or 100 percent of their dissertation to Google.

To students raised in the Internet era, the idea of electronically submitting their work and then seeing it posted for all the world to see is a no-brainer.

“There’s something satisfying about holding a physical copy of the product of seven or eight years of college work,” said Greg Roberts of Concord, a mechanical engineering student studying in Stanford’s Graduate Community Center. “But this just makes a lot of sense.”

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/11/16/BA721AK4NV.DTL

This article appeared on page C – 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

Nobel Prize-winning scientists urge Congress to act on Open Access

November 14th, 2009 by David Michalski

Nobel Prize-winning scientists urge Congress to act on Federal Research Public Access Act

Nobel Prize-winning scientists urge Congress to act to ensure free
online access to federally funded research results

Washington, DC – “For America to obtain an optimal return on our
investment in science, publicly funded research must be shared as
broadly as possible,” is the message that forty one Nobel Prize-
winning scientists in medicine, physics, and chemistry gave to
Congress in an open letter delivered yesterday. The letter marks the
fourth time in five years that leading scientists have called on
Congress to ensure free, timely access to the results of federally
funded research – this time asking leaders to support the Federal
Research Public Access Act of 2009 (S.1373).

The Nobel Prize-winners write:

“As the pursuit of science is increasingly conducted in a digital
world, we need policies that ensure that the opportunities the
Internet presents for new research tools and techniques to be employed
can be fully exploited. The removal of access barriers and the
enabling of expanded use of research findings has the potential to
dramatically transform how we approach issues of vital importance to
the public, such as biomedicine, climate change, and energy research.
As scientists, and as taxpayers too, we support FRPAA and urge its
passage.”

The bi-partisan Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), introduced
by Senators Lieberman (I-CT) and Cornyn (R-TX), would deliver online
public access to the published results of research funded through
eleven U.S. agencies and departments, requiring that peer-reviewed
journal articles stemming from publicly funded research be made
available in an online repository no later than six months after
publication.

The Nobelists note that enabling access to this information would be
an important contribution in fostering innovation and fueling positive
economic and social returns:

“The open availability of federally funded research for broad public
use in open online archives is a crucial building block in laying a
strong national foundation to support accelerated discovery and
innovation. It encourages broader participation in the scientific
process by providing equitable access to high-quality research results
to researchers at higher education institutions of all kinds – from
research-intensive universities to community colleges alike. It can
empower more members of the public to become engaged in citizen
science efforts in areas that pique their imagination. It will equip
entrepreneurs and small business owners with the very latest research
developments, allowing them to more effectively compete in the
development of new technologies and innovations. Open availability of
this research will expand the worldwide visibility of the research
conducted in the U.S. and increase the impact of our collective
investment in research.”

The full text of the letter is online at http://www.taxpayeraccess.org/supporters/scientists
.

The Federal Research Public Access Act would build upon the success of
the first U.S. requirement for public access to publicly funded
research, through the National Institutes of Health. It is widely
supported by a broad set of stakeholders, including: scientists,
higher education leaders, librarians, consumer and economic groups
(including the Committee on Economic Development), technology
companies (including Amazon.com, Ask.com, Bloomberg, eBay, Google,
Yahoo!, and state and local ISPs), publishers, patients and patient
advocates, and major national and regional research organizations. For
full details on support for the Act, visit http://www.taxpayeraccess.org/frpaa
.

Open Humanities Press: new journals aim to solve publishing crisis

October 4th, 2009 by David Michalski

Like the UC Libraries eScholarship program, which facilitates the creation of peer reviewed open access journals, (See the UC Peer Reviewed Series in eScholarship) the Open Humanities Press seeks to provide a solution to the current crisis in academic publishing.

The Open Humanities Press has organized an impressive editorial board and is publishing an important set of scholarly journals. These include:

Visit the Open Humanities Press site to learn more about the open access movement and why it is important to faculty, students, libraries, and the future of academic publishing and the peer-reviewed system.

The Open Humanities Press has also launched a new series in critical theory published in conjunction with the University of Michigan Library’s Scholarly Publishing Office.

And… the University of Michigan’s Scholarly Publishing Office is hosting another set of peer-reviewed open access journals, including…

Journal of Anthropological Research

The Medieval Review

Michigan Feminist Studies

passages

Philosopher’s Imprint

Plagiary

Post Identity

Proceedings of the Western Society for French History

To learn more about how you can benefit from these initiatives please plan to attend UC Davis’ eScholarship presentation:

Taking Back Your Scholarship
Cathrine Mitchell, Director, CDL Publishing Group
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
Shields Library, Second Floor Instruction Room

More info can also be obtained by contacting me, David Michalski, Social, Behavioral and Cultural Studies Librarian, UC Davis.

Open Access Week event

October 2nd, 2009 by David Michalski

“Take Control of Your Publications with eScholarship”
An Open Access Week Presentation

Catherine Mitchell
Director, CDL Publishing Group
University of California

Tuesday, October 20, 2009
1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
Shields Library, Second Floor Instruction Room

Keep your copyright
Reach more reader
Publish when you want t
Protect your work’s future
…all with no fees
eScholarship offers a robust open access* publishing platform that enables departments, research units, publishing programs, and individual scholars associated with the University of California to have direct control over the creation and dissemination of the full range of their scholarship, including:

  • Peer Reviewed Journals
  • Conference Proceedings
  • Books
  • Working Papers
  • Postprints
  • Seminar/Paper Series

Initiated in 2002, eScholarship now houses over 30,000 publications with more than 9 million full-text downloads to date. The rate of usage of these materials has grown dramatically in the past 7 years, now often exceeding 170,000 downloads per month.

Come learn how you can get started publishing with eScholarship today!

“Open-access (OA) literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions…OA is entirely compatible with peer review, and all the major OA initiatives for scientific and scholarly literature insist on its importance.”

RESOURCE: European History Primary Sources

June 13th, 2009 by Roberto C. Delgadillo

 

The Department of History and Civilization and the Library of the European University Institute, Florence, are pleased to announce the official launch of European History Primary Sources (EHPS), an index of scholarly websites that offer on-line access to primary sources on the history of Europe from Medieval and Early Modern History up to the most recent history of the European integration process. The purpose of European History Primary Sources is to provide historians with an easily searchable index of websites that offer online access to primary sources on the history of Europe. As the number of digital archives and collections on the internet continues to grow, maintaining an overview becomes increasingly difficult. EHPS strives to fill that gap by selecting the most important collections of digital primary sources for the history of Europe, either as a whole or for individual countries. EHPS is updated continuously and several collaborative features are introduced in the portal. It is very easy to stay updated on new entries and registered users can bookmark entries, leave comments to add their experiences to the descriptions on EHPS listed websites, complete EHPS abstracts with their own individual experiences and suggest new websites to be included. Since the launch of a beta version in September 2008, EHPS has already attracted significant interest from historians. In order to improve the user experience you are invited to send your feedback and suggestions so that the portal can be developed further. The portal was built and is maintained by Dr. Gerben Zaagsma (University College London) with the open source content management system Drupal.

 

Access: http://primary-sources.eui.eu/

Springer Open Choice program

June 12th, 2009 by David Michalski

Are you publishing in a Springer journal?
If so, you’re eligible for the Springer Open Choice program, which will make your scholarship more accessible by exposing your research to more readers.

  • There are no charges for UC authors to participate in the Open Choice program.
  • Costs are covered by the license between the UC Libraries and Springer. This ground-breaking agreement enables UC-authored articles accepted for publication in most of the 2000+ Springer journals to be published through Springer Open Choice, allowing full and immediate access to all readers. These articles will also be fully accessible through UC’s eScholarship publishing platform. UC authors do not pay the usual $3,000 fee to participate in the Springer open access program.
  • The corresponding author does not have to be affiliated with UC to take advantage of this arrangement – any article is eligible as long as there is one UC author.
  • The agreement, which was negotiated by the UC Libraries as part of its journal license, is a two year pilot and covers more than 2,000 journals in all of the subject areas in which Springer publishes.
  • The open access arrangement covers journal articles only, not books or book chapters.
  • UC authors retain the copyright to their articles under Springer Open Choice.
  • The only requirement is that the authors agree to make the article available under the Springer Open Choice License.
  • The Springer Open Choice program makes articles published in Springer journals available online once they have been through the peer review process and been accepted for publication. The final published articles, including all revisions resulting from peer review and copy-editing, are made available with full open access to all via the SpringerLink platform under a license compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial license. Open Choice articles can be used in course packs, course web pages, e-Reserves, and for other educational purposes, provided that the appropriate attribution is included. When perusing the Springer Open Choice website, UC authors should ignore the information pertaining to author fees.
  • UC is interested in broad participation to gauge the usefulness of this open access pilot and to assess the level of interest on the part of UC authors in open access publishing options.  We invite UC authors to share information about the pilot widely among your colleagues.

If you want more information, look at the FAQ and other information at <http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/alternatives/springer.html> or contact Assistant University Librarian for Technical Services, Mary Page (mpage@ucdavis.edu).  Campus liaisons also welcome your feedback on the arrangement.

The libraries will be conducting a more formal assessment later in the pilot. If you are willing to be contacted later on as part of that assessment please let Mary Page know.

Thank You

RESOURCE: The Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD)

May 30th, 2009 by Roberto C. Delgadillo

 

The Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the adoption, creation, use, dissemination and preservation of electronic analogues to the traditional paper-based theses and dissertations. This website contains information about the initiative, how to set up Electronic Theses and Dissertation (ETD) programs, how to create and locate ETDs, and current research in digital libraries related to NDLTD and ETDs.

 

Access: http://www.ndltd.org/

Social Science Research Network

April 15th, 2009 by David Michalski

Are you familiar with the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)? This open access network is devoted to the rapid worldwide dissemination of social science research, mainly in the form of working papers. It is composed of a number of specialized research networks in each of the social sciences, including business / economics, sociology, and psychology. The network has even opened specialized networks for English literature, and Philosophy.

The objective, according to the site, is to “provide worldwide distribution of research to authors and their readers and to facilitate communication among them at the lowest possible cost.” Authors are allowed to upload papers without charge, and the majority of downloads of papers from the SSRN eLibrary are free.

SSRN Social Science Research Network
http://www.ssrn.com/

Article on Journal Prices and Library Budgets

April 15th, 2009 by David Michalski

Library Journal article discusses the challenges research libraries and scholars face as budgets tighten and journal prices rise, includes survey of the average price per journal subscription.

Reality Bites: Periodicals Price Survey 2009
In the face of the downturn, libraries and publishers brace for big cuts
By Lee C. Van Orsdel & Kathleen Born — Library Journal, 4/15/2009

“As waves of grim economic news wash over state and federal governments here and abroad, libraries of all types and sizes are bracing for budget cuts the likes of which have not been seen in three generations…”

http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6651248.html

OpenSecrets.org Goes OpenData

April 14th, 2009 by Marcia Meister

os_logo

The Center for Responsive Politics announced on April 13 that it’s putting 200 million data records from its archive directly into the hands of citizens, activists, journalists and anyone else interested in following the money in U.S. politics. The data are available through the site’s Action Center.

To download bulk data from OpenSecrets.org, users must register on the site and agree to prominently credit the Center for Responsive Politics, along with other terms of service. CRP is making its data available through a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike license, which allows users to remix, tweak, build upon and share the Center’s work non-commercially. CRP will continue to offer its data to commercial users for a negotiable fee.

The following data sets, along with a user guide, resource tables and other documentation, are now available in CSV format (comma-separated values, for easy importing) through OpenSecrets.org’s Action Center at http://www.opensecrets.org/action/data.php

CAMPAIGN FINANCE: 195 million records dating to the 1989-1990 election cycle, tracking campaign fundraising and spending by candidates for federal office, as well as political parties and political action committees. CRP’s researchers add value to Federal Election Commission data by cleaning up and categorizing contribution records. This allows for easier totaling by industry and company or organization, to measure special-interest influence.

LOBBYING: 3.5 million records on federal lobbyists, their clients, their fees and the issues they reported working on, dating to 1998. Industry codes have been applied to this data, as well.

PERSONAL FINANCES: Reports from members of Congress and the executive branch that detail their personal assets, liabilities and transactions in 2004 through 2007. The reports covering 2008 will become available to the public in June, and the data will be available for download once CRP has keyed those reports.

527 ORGANIZATIONS: Electronically filed financial records beginning in the 2004 election cycle for the shadowy issue-advocacy groups known as 527s, which can raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, labor unions and individuals.

OpenSecrets.org also offers a number of APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) to give users direct access via web programming to data displayed on OpenSecrets.org. Web developers are already using these APIs to display OpenSecrets data on their web pages and create mashups using live, up-to-date data.

Users can also share CRP data using OpenSecrets.org’s widgets, which can be placed easily on any website or blog. New widgets for the 2010 election cycle are in development.

OpenSecrets.org, an independent website tracking the influence of money on U.S. politics, continues to offer campaign financial disclosure information, data and analysis through it’s website.